Protracted national conflict and fertility change: Palestinians and Israelis in the twentieth century.

نویسنده

  • P Fargues
چکیده

TIIECOURSE OF fertility change in Palestine and Israel over the second half of the twentieth century might seem of negligible interest for the history of the demographic transition, since their combined 8.9 million inhabitants represent only one-sixth of one percent of the world population. Yet the exceptional political history of these populations, in which demography played a major role for both sides in nation-building, sheds a particular light on the political dimension of fertility change, a matter of interest beyond the limits of this small piece of land. Nowhere else in the world are populations at the two extremes of fertility transition found side by side in such a small territory (26,351 km2), with total fertility rates ranging from barely above the replacement level among Jews born in Europe and among Christian Arab Israelis (2.1 3 and 2.10 respectively in 1992-96), to the highest level recorded in today's world among Palestinians of the Gaza Strip (7.73 in 1991-95). In this article, I argue that these extreme contrasts of fertility are a corollary of the long-lasting state of belligerence between Arab Palestinians and Jews that began in the wake of the Balfour Declaration of 1917. Most demographic research is conducted at the national level, both for practical reasons (the state has taken the lead in the collection of statistics and the construction of statistical categories applied to population) and for reasons of ideology (population is fundamentally conceived as a national body). Accordingly, most studies of demographic differentials are made within the fraine of international boundaries. This circumstance applies to the demographic literature on Israelis and Palestinians. Usual comparisons in this literature are between populations found within the same national entity, whether Israel proper (Ashkenazi Jews vs. Sephardic Jews; native Jews vs. immigrant Jews; Jews vs. non-Jews-by default: Arabs; Muslims vs. Christians), or within the Palestinian territories (West Bank vs. Gaza Strip; refugees vs. nonrefugees) .' Territory and borders are fundamental ref-

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Both sides retaliate in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Ending violent international conflicts requires understanding the causal factors that perpetuate them. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israelis and Palestinians each tend to see themselves as victims, engaging in violence only in response to attacks initiated by a fundamentally and implacably violent foe bent on their destruction. Econometric techniques allow us to empirically test the deg...

متن کامل

Leidner , Emanuele Castano and Jeremy Ginges Conflict Resolution Strategies Dehumanization , Retributive and Restorative Justice , and Aggressive Versus Diplomatic Intergroup

The desire for justice can escalate or facilitate resolution of intergroup conflicts. Two studies investigated retributive and restorative notions of justice as the mediating factor of the effect of perceived outgroup sentience—an aspect of (mechanistic) dehumanization referring to the emotional depth attributed to others—on intergroup conflict resolution. Study 1 showed that for Palestinians, ...

متن کامل

Israel’s Dilemma: Unity or Peace?

Ever since President Bush introduced his ‘Road Map’ for a permanent solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in April 2003, a great deal of public attention has focused on its demand for a reformed Palestinian Authority (PA) to confront aggressively radical Palestinian groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad who violently oppose a two-state solution to the conflict. One of the major obstacle...

متن کامل

Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict.

Five studies across cultures involving 661 American Democrats and Republicans, 995 Israelis, and 1,266 Palestinians provide previously unidentified evidence of a fundamental bias, what we term the "motive attribution asymmetry," driving seemingly intractable human conflict. These studies show that in political and ethnoreligious intergroup conflict, adversaries tend to attribute their own group...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Population and development review

دوره 26 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000